Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Nurse convicted of fraud appeals termination of nursing licence.

Search form

Main navigation

  • Home

HOME | ALL NEWS

Nurse convicted of fraud appeals termination of nursing licence.

Thursday, 6 July, 2023 - 05:54

A nurse made a fraudulent claim for sick leave and was convicted. She appealed and lost and is now seeking a non-judicial review of that decision. The Fitness to Practise Panel of the Nursing and Midwifery Council struck her off the register of mental health nurses. The applied for Judicial Review of that decision.

Neneh Fofanah was struck off in September 2022 following her conviction for fraud.

The facts of the criminal case are remarkable: Fofanah told her employer that she was not fit to work and claimed sick-pay and pay for compassionate leave during the period from July 2014 until October 2015. She was employed by the Cheshire and Wirral Hospital Trust, funded by the National Health Service.

Yet, while "off sick" and receiving pay from that Trust, she was in fact working - and being paid - at a hospital in Derby.

Her defences include " that the conviction was a miscarriage of justice and that she was not guilty of fraud. In essence, her position is that she was not dishonest; that she acted with the knowledge of her employer; and that false allegations are made against her. By way of background her contention was that she was genuinely unfit for the Cheshire and Wirral work but that the work for Derby was of a different nature and/or therapeutic."

The Judge in the striking off case was meticulous in his review of the facts and law and very clear in his judgment.

Fofanah had been properly convicted and her defence is spurious and the Council was justified in striking her off. Of course, he was a little more circumspect in his choice of words: " the panel was entitled, and indeed bound, to proceed on the
footing of the dishonesty as shown by the conviction. In those circumstances it was
entitled to come to the conclusion that there was impairment of the Appellant's fitness
to practise. I go as far as to say any other conclusion would have been bordering on the
perverse. "

Why is it interesting to us? It's because the case demonstrates the lengths that a fraudster will go to manufacture a defence, and maintain it in the face of reason, and to try to avoid the consequences of the conduct.

Given that the criminal court, despite the seriousness of the offence, handed down a suspended sentence for the offence of defrauding an employer and, indirectly, the taxpayer it is perhaps surprising that she didn't quietly accept her good fortune.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Fofaneh-v.-Nursing-…

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Footer menu

  • Weekly Digest (opens in new tab)
  • Images attribution (opens in new tab)
  • Corporate, privacy, intellectual property and access (opens in new tab)
  • Advertising and Recommendations (opens in new tab)
  • Promote your business (opens in new tab)
  • Enquiries (opens in new tab)


 

BOT AND SCRAPER ACCESS DENIED

 


 

Built with Drupal     |     Hosted by Siteground     |     Template by Alaa Haddad     

Design by Vortex Centrum Limited    |     Some services provided by Google Workspace    

Posters and other merch by ProjectLXX   |   Privacy and security services by Surfshark and Firetrust. 


Nothing in this website is intended to be or shall be taken as legal advice. 

You should always seek advice from a practitioner experienced in this area. 


Everything on this website is copyright Nigel Morris-Cotterill and/or Vortex Centrum Limited for itself or one of its business units. No downloading, printing or other means of replicating or reusing is permitted. In particular, all bot access is denied and all scraping of content will result in the legal action set forth in the terms and conditions in this site. For legal, cookies and privacy see vortexcentrum.com.

Copyright 1999- © 2026 Vortex Centrum Limited - All rights reserved. Bot access denied.