Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Kumar: the dangers of homogenisation of management through mentoring

Search form

Main navigation

  • Home

Kumar: the dangers of homogenisation of management through mentoring

Tuesday, 13 May, 2025 - 01:18

Clone & Doom: The Risk Hiding in Your Mentorship Programme

Dr. Aneish Kumar shows how, over time, companies end up being run by a herd of people who follow the CEO and why this lack of variety of thought is a bad thing.

The Day the Brainstorm Went Beige 

Three Mondays ago, I joined a product huddle at a fast-growing fintech firm. Ten of their sharpest minds crammed into a glass-walled room to ideate features for the next sprint. At first, the energy was electric—but as the meeting progressed, a strange déjà vu settled in. Every suggestion on the whiteboard felt recycled, as if last quarter’s road map had simply been re-copied with fresh bullet points.

Later, over lattes, someone quipped, “We all trained under Raj. He taught us to only ship what he would build.” Raj is undeniably brilliant, but the punchline stung: this company hadn’t delivered a genuinely breakthrough feature in two years. Their fiercest competitor wasn’t another startup - it was Ctrl +C, Ctrl + V leadership from within.

Mentor Myopia: The Quiet Clone Crisis 

When mentors become enamoured with their own playbooks, they inadvertently manufacture carbon-copy protégé. It’s like planting the same tree over and over and calling it a forest. Academic studies have warned of this for years: mentors tend to choose proteges who remind them of themselves, reinforcing unconscious bias and stifling cognitive diversity. A Harvard Law Review paper even dubs it “legacy over leadership,” and one corporate mentoring platform lists “expecting the mentee to become a clone” among the top seven causes of broken mentorships.

Why Cloning Feels Comfortable 

Cloning often stems from comfort more than ego. Leaders tell themselves that if proteges think like them, projects will move faster—yet groupthink then blind-sides the team, and no one spots the hidden iceberg. They find validation in passing on their own methods, believing it cements a legacy—only to cap their organisation’s horizons and miss untapped markets. And because they “click” so naturally with protégés who mirror their thinking, affinity bias quietly filters out dissenting talent. Ironically, a 2024 meta-analysis found that teams with mixed cognitive styles solved problems 30% faster. Cloning might feel efficient—until the day you need an idea you’ve never had before and realise your team was built in your exact image.

Dr Aneish Kumar is at https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-aneish-kumar-422426b6/

How to Spot Mentor Myopia

Still not sure if you’re nurturing originality or simply mirroring yourself? Take a hard look around:

  • Uniform LinkedIn Feeds: Do all your proteges quote the same gurus, follow identical podcasts, and track the exact same KPIs?
  • “Copy-Me” Career Paths: Are your top performers simply retracing your old journey, complete with new titles?
  • Idea Approval Bottlenecks: Are 90% of new initiatives still funnelled back through one mentor’s gate?

If your protégés can finish your sentences before you start them, is that chemistry—or a worrying sign that only one brain is truly at work?

What Happens When Mentorship Becomes Mimicry

The fallout from cloning runs deeper than you might think:

  • Innovation Drought: A global apparel brand discovered each new clothing line had nearly identical colour palettes—because the VP of Design had mentored the entire concept team. Sales plunged 12%.
  • Talent Flight: Two savvy managers at a logistics firm proposed a breakthrough routing system—and their mentor shot it down: “That’s not how I’d do it.” They quit and launched a competing startup now valued at 1,200,000,000 Indian Rupees.
  • Investor Scepticism: A unicorn’s valuation took a hit when VCs noticed every second-tier exec sounded the same. The red flag? Fragile governance with zero room for fresh thinking.

 

Five Ways to Break the Cloning Cycle

 

  1. Mentor Rotation: Pair protégés with at least three different types of leaders over 18 months—finance, operations, and creative—to broaden perspectives.
  2. Reverse Mentoring Hours: Every quarter, let the protégé teach you something—a new tool, cultural insight, or life hack—to foster mutual respect and humility.
  3. Idea-Credit Ledger: Track who suggests what. If most ideas still echo the mentor’s playbook, it’s time to open up the floor.
  4. Bias Audits: Use anonymous feedback to measure how often dissent is welcomed. Awareness training has been proven to improve mentor behaviours and protégé outcomes.
  5. Innovation KPIs: Tie leader bonuses to novelty metrics—how many new ideas didn’t originate from your own road map? Celebrate every divergence.

 

Great Mentorship Is Jazz, Not Karaoke 

True mentorship isn’t about singing in unison—it’s about improvisation. Like a jazz band, the mentor sets a rhythm but invites protégés to riff, experiment and play unexpected new notes. Cloning may feel easier, but it turns your team into a tribute act: perfect copies, creatively empty.

From Mirrors to Prisms 

A mirror reflects one image. A prism refracts a single beam into a spectrum of possibilities. Mentors who hand out mirrors create admirers; those who offer prisms build trailblazers. 

Next time you guide someone’s career, ask yourself ; Am I handing over a mirror… or offering a prism? Your answer shapes not just a mentee’s career path—but the legacy you leave behind.

 


About this section

Opinion pieces or "Op-Eds" are the home-made bombs of the publishing world. So long as they meet editorial standards, are not intentionally offensive with a view to causing hurt or insult and are relevant to our field of endeavour, we will look at submissions.

We like contentious, we like contrarian views. We don't like pretty much any -ism . We recognise that Opinion pieces are one person's view and are not balanced (if they are balanced and reach a reasoned conclusion, they are probably more suited to the Articles section). We do not like acronyms and buzzwords.

Op-Eds are the author's personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of World Money Laundering Report or its publishers.

To submit an Opinion piece, please complete the Contact form.

Footer menu

  • Weekly Digest (opens in new tab)
  • Images attribution (opens in new tab)
  • Corporate, privacy, intellectual property and access (opens in new tab)
  • Advertising and Recommendations (opens in new tab)
  • Promote your business (opens in new tab)
  • Enquiries (opens in new tab)


 

BOT AND SCRAPER ACCESS DENIED

 


 

Built with Drupal     |     Hosted by Siteground     |     Template by Alaa Haddad     

Design by Vortex Centrum Limited    |     Some services provided by Google Workspace    

Posters and other merch by ProjectLXX   |   Privacy and security services by Surfshark and Firetrust. 


Nothing in this website is intended to be or shall be taken as legal advice. 

You should always seek advice from a practitioner experienced in this area. 


Everything on this website is copyright Nigel Morris-Cotterill and/or Vortex Centrum Limited for itself or one of its business units. No downloading, printing or other means of replicating or reusing is permitted. In particular, all bot access is denied and all scraping of content will result in the legal action set forth in the terms and conditions in this site. For legal, cookies and privacy see vortexcentrum.com.

Copyright 1999- © 2026 Vortex Centrum Limited - All rights reserved. Bot access denied.